Hospital implementation of health information technology and quality of care: are they related?
© Restuccia et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 26 October 2011
Accepted: 23 June 2012
Published: 27 September 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|26 Oct 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Oliver Groene|
|10 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - William Encinosa|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Oliver Groene|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|23 Jun 2012||Editorially accepted|
|27 Sep 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6947-12-109|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.