Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Extensions to Regret-based Decision Curve Analysis: An application to hospice referral for terminal patients

  • Athanasios Tsalatsanis1Email author,
  • Laura E Barnes1,
  • Iztok Hozo2 and
  • Benjamin Djulbegovic1, 3
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making201111:77

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-11-77

Received: 26 August 2011

Accepted: 23 December 2011

Published: 23 December 2011

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
26 Aug 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
26 Oct 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - ALAN HAYCOX
16 Nov 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Charles Normand
2 Dec 2011 Author responded Author comments - Athanasios Tsalatsanis
Resubmission - Version 3
2 Dec 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Dec 2011 Editorially accepted
23 Dec 2011 Article published 10.1186/1472-6947-11-77

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Center for Evidence-based Medicine and Health Outcomes Research, University of South Florida
Department of Mathematics, Indiana University Northwest
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute