Redesign of a computerized clinical reminder for colorectal cancer screening: a human-computer interaction evaluation
© Saleem et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 10 August 2011
Accepted: 29 November 2011
Published: 29 November 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|10 Aug 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|18 Sep 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ayse Gurses|
|21 Sep 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Monique Jaspers|
|26 Oct 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Jason Saleem|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|26 Oct 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|14 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ayse Gurses|
|20 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Monique Jaspers|
|25 Nov 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Jason Saleem|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|25 Nov 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|29 Nov 2011||Editorially accepted|
|29 Nov 2011||Article published||10.1186/1472-6947-11-74|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.