Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Does the implementation of an electronic prescribing system create unintended medication errors? A study of the sociotechnical context through the analysis of reported medication incidents

  • Sabi Redwood1Email author,
  • Anna Rajakumar1,
  • James Hodson2 and
  • Jamie J Coleman1, 2
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making201111:29

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-11-29

Received: 1 December 2010

Accepted: 12 May 2011

Published: 12 May 2011

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Dec 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
5 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Derek Stewart
13 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bryony Dean Franklin
22 Feb 2011 Author responded Author comments - Sabi Redwood
Resubmission - Version 3
22 Feb 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
1 Mar 2011 Author responded Author comments - Sabi Redwood
Resubmission - Version 4
1 Mar 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
3 Mar 2011 Author responded Author comments - Sabi Redwood
Resubmission - Version 5
3 Mar 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
20 Mar 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Derek Stewart
29 Mar 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bryony Dean Franklin
8 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - Sabi Redwood
Resubmission - Version 6
8 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
Resubmission - Version 9
Submitted Manuscript version 9
9 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Sabi Redwood
Resubmission - Version 10
9 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 10
Publishing
12 May 2011 Editorially accepted
12 May 2011 Article published 10.1186/1472-6947-11-29

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
University of Birmingham, School of Health and Population Sciences
(2)
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Edgbaston, Mindelsohn Way

Advertisement