How information systems should support the information needs of general dentists in clinical settings: suggestions from a qualitative study
© Song et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 2 September 2009
Accepted: 2 February 2010
Published: 2 February 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|2 Sep 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|21 Oct 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kathryn Ayers|
|22 Oct 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Martin Dawes|
|11 Nov 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Johanna Westbrook|
|16 Dec 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Mei Song|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|16 Dec 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|20 Jan 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Mei Song|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|20 Jan 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|29 Jan 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Mei Song|
|Resubmission - Version 7|
|29 Jan 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 7|
|2 Feb 2010||Editorially accepted|
|2 Feb 2010||Article published||10.1186/1472-6947-10-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.