Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Configural frequency analysis as a method of determining patients' preferred decision-making roles in dialysis

  • Sabine Loeffert1Email author,
  • Oliver Ommen1, 2,
  • Christine Kuch2,
  • Fueloep Scheibler3,
  • Andrej Woehrmann4,
  • Conrad Baldamus5 and
  • Holger Pfaff1, 2
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making201010:47

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-10-47

Received: 24 February 2010

Accepted: 11 September 2010

Published: 11 September 2010

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
24 Feb 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
17 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ian Watt
19 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jan Florin
25 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lewis Cohen
28 May 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hugo Duivenvoorden
27 Jul 2010 Author responded Author comments - Oliver Ommen
Resubmission - Version 4
27 Jul 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
10 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jan Florin
12 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hugo Duivenvoorden
4 Sep 2010 Author responded Author comments - Oliver Ommen
Resubmission - Version 5
4 Sep 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
11 Sep 2010 Editorially accepted
11 Sep 2010 Article published 10.1186/1472-6947-10-47

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Center for Health Services Research Cologne, University of Cologne
(2)
Institute for Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), University of Cologne
(3)
Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care
(4)
Kuratorium fuer Dialyse und Nierentransplantation (KFH)
(5)
Department of Internal Medicine IV (retired), University Hospital of Cologne

Advertisement