Identifying patient preferences for communicating risk estimates: A descriptive pilot study
© Fortin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2001
Received: 5 May 2001
Accepted: 1 August 2001
Published: 1 August 2001
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|5 May 2001||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|18 Jun 2001||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Siegrist|
|29 Jun 2001||Author responded||Author comments - Jennifer Fortin|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|29 Jun 2001||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|9 Jul 2001||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Siegrist|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|25 Jul 2001||Author responded||Author comments - Jennifer Fortin|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|25 Jul 2001||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|1 Aug 2001||Editorially accepted|
|1 Aug 2001||Article published||10.1186/1472-6947-1-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.